ASGE LOG IN

User Name


Password



forgot my credentials  [Close]

RESEARCH

Preface

Quality in Endoscopic Research Award

Applications are currently not being accepted.    

 


Submission

The ASGE Research Committee requires electronic submission in a single PDF file. ASGE membership is a requirement at the time of submission for this award. If you are having problems submitting your grant application, please email the application and/or questions to grants@asge.org or by calling Liz O'Keefe at 630.570.5623.

**Grants not meeting the stated requirements, such as exceeding the page limits, will be administratively returned without review.**

Special Note

If the application is not selected for the Quality in Endoscopy Research Award, it will still be considered for an Endoscopic Research Award.

Description

This award will fund studies to measure or improve quality of care (clinical or patient-oriented or physician behavior outcomes) and/or efficiency in gastrointestinal endoscopy, such as studies to improve the quality of screening colonoscopy. The research committee will consider feasibility/pilot/validation studies if there is an explicit justification for needing preliminary data in anticipation of a subsequent, more definitive, fundable study.

Objective

To foster research relating to measuring quality in gastrointestinal endoscopy both in the academic and private practice setting.

Eligibility

Candidate must be an ASGE member (ASGE membership at the time of application is a requirement for eligibility for grants and awards), be an MD (or have equivalent degree), and be currently practicing in a gastrointestinal endoscopy-related academic institution or private practice setting in North America. Candidates who are delinquent on prior ASGE research grant progress reports are not eligible for future ASGE funding. If the candidate is a trainee, there must be a letter from the Division Chief confirming the trainee's ongoing appointment at the institution for the duration of the grant, and their position title, and/or a contingency plan.

Awards and Requirements

  1. Grants may be requested for up to $75,000 in total funding, and spread over two years of study. Note: If the application is not selected for the Quality in Endoscopy Research Award, it will still be considered for an Endoscopic Research Award.
  2. Requests for funding "seed" projects that will lead to further research, as well as larger requests for definitive clinical trials will be considered. In order to maximize the funds available for research, money for travel to meetings will not be provided, nor will funding be provided for indirect costs.
  3. The budget request should be detailed and all items should be clearly related to the research proposal. Budgets will be carefully scrutinized by the ASGE Research Committee and will be considered in the scoring of the grant. Inappropriate or poorly justified budgets will jeopardize the likelihood of the application receiving an award. Additionally, the research committee retains the right to adjust the award to an amount it feels appropriate for the project.
  4. Funding requests may include:
    1. Personnel (research assistant and/or faculty salary support-percentage of time for study should be specified and appropriately justified).
    2. Study supplies
    3. Equipment essential for study
     
  1. Funding will not be provided for:
    1. Salary support for trainees
    2. Computer purchases (unless a unique application is proposed)
    3. Standard equipment and supplies needed for appropriate patient care (for example, sclerotherapy needles)
    4. Travel to meetings
    5. Indirect costs
     
  1. Duration of funding: up to two years. The second year of continued funding is contingent on satisfactory study progress determined by the Chair of the Research Committee based on mandatory annual progress reports.
  2. Studies which include more than one center will require institutional review board approval from each center. The participating institutions and investigators should be specified in the application.
  3. Progress reports must be submitted to the Chair of the Research Committee via the ASGE Administrative Offices every 12 months for the duration of the project (ideally in advance of the 1-year mark for 2-year studies so that the second year's funding is not delayed. Progress reports must include a financial statement from the institutional grants or accounting office. Failure to submit a progress report by the stated deadline may affect future funding.
  4. Requests for no-cost extensions must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Research Committee via the ASGE administrative office. This request should include a) a detailed summary regarding how grant money has been spent (or forecasted to be spent) up to the original award end date, and b) a proposed budget describing in reasonable detail how the remaining funds will be spent in the upcoming year. Although the mentor can be, and should be, involved in this No-Cost Extension and Progress Report, it should not be written by the mentor - it should be drafted by and signed by the mentee PI. Change in PI for the upcoming award period should be proposed by and justified by the original PI, including changes of the PI-ship to the mentor.

Upon completion of the award, ASGE requires that a final scientific and financial report from the grants or account office be submitted. All publications and abstracts must acknowledge support from the ASGE.

Selection Criteria

Grants are awarded based on the scientific merit of the proposal and assessment of the investigator's ability to complete the project (supportive environment, experience, training, availability of patients and other resources needed). The proposed research project must be approved by the ASGE Research Committee and should also be of such quality as to lead to presentation at Digestive Disease Week® and subsequent full publication. One objective of these ASGE awards is the eventual submission of larger research funding requests, including federal funding, and proposals with such potential will be given priority.

Review Process

The ASGE Research Committee will review the Quality in Endoscopy Research Award proposals and recommend a single award. The final selection of awards is made by the ASGE Governing Board.

Deadline

Applications are currently not being accepted.

*The number of awards granted is contingent on funds available.

Grant Proposal Outline

Each application must have page numbers, be in Arial 11 point font, with >0.75" margins, and contain:

1. Abstract - Include name, institution, project title, mentor name if applicable, and a one-page summary of the proposal including hypothesis and goals. Suggested headings include: Background; Aims/Hypothesis; Methods; Analysis and Sample size Calculation; Timeline and Feasibility; Future Study. Limit to one page.

2. Biosketch- Provide NIH-style biosketch for candidate, mentor and co-investigators that includes all relevant publications and current funding (see example at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html)Limit to four pages.

3. Grant Proposal - Prepare according to NIH-form SF 424 (R&R) guidelines. (excluding references) Limit to five pages.

      a. Title and Introduction

      b. Hypothesis & Specific Aims - This should be a clear statement of the problem, the related hypothesis/question and a brief description of the proposed scientific plan. Provide a concise explanation in a few sentences.

      c. Background and Significance- Justification regarding scope of the problem, and relevance to ASGE membership and the endoscopy community.

      d. Innovation

      e. Preliminary Results- Outline prior studies or your pilot work already completed in this area. If prior studies have not been done by your group, give brief details of pilot work done by others.

      f. Approach - Describe the methods of collection and analysis of the data. A statistical data analysis plan, including sample size calculations, is required, even for retrospective studies. Be as specific as possible. Links to sample size calculators and basic on-line statistical calculators are included below: GraphpadRStatistics Online Computational Resource (SOCR)Rollin Brant's sample size calculator,University of Iowa sample size calculator

     g. Pitfalls, alternatives and future directions

     h. Conflict of Interest - A statement regarding conflict of interest and/or financial ownership, patent rights, etc. of technique/devices being studied in the grant proposal must be included in each grant application, along with a plan for resolution of these conflicts. If conflicts are significant and do not appear to be able to be resolved, the application may be denied.

4. References - Limit to two pages.

5. Budget - Please justify all items (including %effort) with a separate budget justification page. Budgets will be carefully scrutinized by the Research Committee and will be considered in the scoring of the grant. Inappropriate or poorly justified budgets will jeopardize the likelihood of the application receiving an award. Additionally, the committee retains the right to adjust the award to an amount it feels appropriate for the project. Limit to one page for budget, one page for justification.

     a. The maximum request should be $75,000 total. Grant support for this amount may be spread over two years. The second year of continued funding is contingent on satisfactory progress demonstrated in mandatory yearly progress reports.

     b. The budget request should be detailed and all items should be clearly related to the research proposal.

     c. Funding requests (see "Awards and Requirements" section numbers 3-5).

     d. Submitted projects for additional funding should include a copy of the previous year's budget and Progress Report Form.

6. Resources and Environment - List facilities, equipment, and available personnel required to complete this project. Be aware that reviewers of the grant may not be aware of the resources and/or patient volumes of your center. Letters of collaborations should be included, if applicable, especially if from other institutions. Limit resources statement and collaborator letters to one page each.

7. Institutional Review Board - Attach IRB approval or proof of exempt status, if available (this may help if ability to obtain IRB approval is called into question by the committee). If not available at time of application, and the application is funded, no funds will be released until IRB approval is received by the ASGE Research office.

8. Grantees seeking supplemental funds for previously awarded ASGE research studies should submit a copy of the previous budget and financial report in order to be considered for additional funding.



Check List

General Information
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Applicable Signatures

 *
 
Supporting Documentation

Helpful Suggestions:
  • Make sure the path specified is correct
  • Make sure the file is not empty
  • Make sure you have rights to access the file
  • File name must be less than 50 characters
  • Click the Add Another File icon to add additonal upload fields for your additional documents

 Add Another File