Elsevier

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volume 85, Issue 2, February 2017, Pages 273-281
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Guideline
Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.036Get rights and content

Section snippets

Statement on credentialing, recredentialing, and granting privileges for GI endoscopy

A primary mission of the ASGE is to promote high-quality patient care and safety in the field of GI endoscopy. The purpose of this statement is to provide a suitable framework for determining the competency of practicing endoscopists and for the granting of privileges to perform endoscopic procedures. Guidelines for the granting of privileges for newly developed endoscopic procedures are also provided. As such, this document provides principles and practical guidelines to assist credentialing

Definition of terms

A number of terms related to competency and privileging of procedures are summarized in Table 2. Generally speaking, training in endoscopic techniques must be adequate for each major category of endoscopy for which privileges are requested. The need to seek and attain competency in new procedures may periodically arise for endoscopists over the course of their career. New procedures should be taught by preceptors using a validated curriculum. The preceptor should be responsible for setting

Uniformity of standards

The goal of a credentialing organization in granting privileges to perform endoscopic procedures must be to ensure the delivery of high-quality care for all patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Uniform standards should be developed that apply to all hospital staff requesting privileges to perform endoscopy, regardless of medical specialty, and to all areas where endoscopy is performed. Criteria must be established that are medically sound and applicable to all wishing to obtain privileges

General principles of credentialing and granting hospital privileges for GI endoscopy

Box 1 lists the basic principles of credentialing and privileging for GI endoscopy. The implementation of credentialing policies and the granting of privileges is the responsibility of individual healthcare organizations.4 Credentialing can only begin after successful completion of a GI endoscopy training program in adult or pediatric gastroenterology or general surgery as described in a previous ASGE document.5 It should be the responsibility of the service chief or an individual in a

Standards of practice documents for credentialing for GI endoscopy

In the following sections, the ASGE has developed credentialing guidelines, using evidence-based, objective measures whenever possible, for the following procedures/skills: moderate sedation, EGD, colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, capsule endoscopy, ERCP, EUS, EMR, endoscopic submucosal dissection, ablative techniques, enteral stent placement, deep enteroscopy (DE), and endoscopic enteral tube placement. Table 3 lists an evidence-based or expert consensus–derived minimum number for each

Emerging technologies

The practice of GI endoscopy is dynamic and continues to evolve. Standard endoscopic procedures continually undergo refinement, and new major techniques are introduced. New technologies that have left the experimental and developmental stages with demonstrated efficacy may be ready for adoption into clinical practice. Endoscopists who have not received conventional formal training in newly developed techniques may wish to acquire necessary credentials. The degree of training, direct

Principles of proctoring for endoscopic privileges

Proctoring may represent an important part of granting endoscopic privileges. Proctoring involves an observational assessment of skills by a credentialed endoscopist that may be used in addition to data from a peer-review process. Candidates for proctoring may include applicants for new staff appointments, incumbent staff members trained in additional or novel procedures, and staff members undergoing routine recredentialing processes or remediation.

The role of proctor is to act as an

Recredentialing and renewal of endoscopic privileges

It is the responsibility of each institution to develop and maintain guidelines detailing the methods and frequency required to grant and renew privileges in endoscopic procedures. Recredentialing of endoscopic privileges generally follows regional or state regulations but has been mandated by national accrediting organizations to occur every 2 to 3 years. Individual institutions should have a mechanism in place for addressing instances when minimal competency cannot be assured. These

Recommendations

  • 1.

    We recommend that training in endoscopic techniques must be adequate for each major category of endoscopy for which privileges are requested. ⊕⊕⊕⊕

  • 2.

    We recommend that whenever possible competence should be determined by objective criteria and direct observations and that an arbitrary number of procedures does not guarantee competency. However, minimal threshold numbers for initial credentialing may be set below which competency cannot be assessed. ⊕⊕⊕⊕

  • 3.

    We suggest that uniform standards be developed

Disclosure

The following authors disclosed financial relationships relevant to this publication: V. Chandrasekhara: Consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus; M. A. Khashab: Consultant for BSCI; V. R. Muthusamy: Consultant for Boston Scientific, research support and honorarium recipient from Covidien GI Solutions; J. Yang: Consultant for Cook; J. M. DeWitt: Consultant for Olympus America. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

References (60)

  • B.J. Spier et al.

    Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2010)
  • S.G. Shah et al.

    Use of video and magnetic endoscope imaging for rating competence at colonoscopy: validation of a measurement tool

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2002)
  • M.B. Wallace et al.

    Screening for colorectal cancer with flexible sigmoidoscopy by nonphysician endoscopists

    Am J Med

    (1999)
  • D.E. Early et al.

    Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2012)
  • P.B. Cotton et al.

    Excellence in endoscopy: toward practical metrics

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2006)
  • M.L. Freeman et al.

    Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2001)
  • N. Shahidi et al.

    When trainees reach competency in performing ERCP: a systematic review

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2015)
  • P.B. Cotton

    ERCP (Ensuring Really Competent Practice): enough words—action please!

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2015)
  • J.L. Watkins et al.

    Assessment of technical competence during ERCP training

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1996)
  • S.M. Schutz et al.

    Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2000)
  • E. Rajan et al.

    Training in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: assessing and defining competency

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2013)
  • R. Sidhu et al.

    Is formal training necessary for capsule endoscopy? The largest gastroenterology trainee study with controls

    Dig Liver Dis

    (2008)
  • E.A. Rajan et al.

    Small-bowel endoscopy core curriculum

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2013)
  • M.A. Khashab et al.

    The role of deep enteroscopy in the management of small-bowel disorders

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2015)
  • S. Mehdizadeh et al.

    Success rate of retrograde double-balloon enteroscopy

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2007)
  • A. Moss et al.

    Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia

    Gastroenterology

    (2011)
  • V. Chandrasekhara et al.

    Endoscopic mucosal resection: not your father's polypectomy anymore

    Gastroenterology

    (2011)
  • J.H. Hwang et al.

    Endoscopic mucosal resection

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2015)
  • D.I. Fudman et al.

    Positive correlation between endoscopist radiofrequency ablation volume and response rates in Barrett's esophagus

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2014)
  • T. Kowalski et al.

    Perceptions of gastroenterology fellows regarding ERCP competency and training

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2003)
  • Cited by (149)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This document was reviewed and approved by the Governing Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

    View full text