Resources

Publications

ASGE members benefit from an array of publications and newsletters in various formats to keep abreast of latest developments in GI endoscopy.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GIE) is ASGE’s preeminent internationally recognized journal on the science and practice of endoscopy   

VideoGIE, an online-only, open access video journal featuring peer-reviewed video case reports and case series of endoscopic procedures

iGIE, the latest ASGE publication; a gold open-access, online only journal that accelerates the publication of peer-reviewed research and best practices, including the work conducted collaboratively and across disciplines

Journal Scan, a weekly newsletter providing expert insights into the latest GI research, offered in two versions:

SCOPE provides a weekly news round-up on all things going on with ASGE and its members around the world

Daily Digest is a succinct quick-read for busy members looking for brief snippets of all that’s going on

Practical Solutions is a monthly newsletter offering resources for the GI team

Trainee Advisor provides a quarterly round-up of news and activities for fellows along their GI pathway

Additional publications that ASGE offers include:

GESAP X

Patient Brochures

Most Recent Practice Guidelines

The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of patients with solid pancreatic neoplasia

Nov 14, 2016, 20:27 PM
This is one of a series of statements discussing the use of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) prepared this document that updates a previously issued consensus statement and a technology status evaluation report on this topic.1 In preparing this guideline, a search of the medical literature was performed by using PubMed between January 1975 and May 2015, with the use of the search terms “pancreatic AND malignancy,” “endoscopy,” “EUS,” and “ERCP.” Additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of expert consultants. When limited or no data existed from welldesigned prospective trials, emphasis is given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Recommendations for appropriate use of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus at the time the documents are drafted. Further controlled clinical studies may be needed to clarify aspects of recommendations contained in this document. This document may be revised as necessary to account for changes in technology, new data, or other aspects of clinical practice. The recommendations were based on reviewed studies and were graded on the strength of the supporting evidence (Table 1).2 The strength of individual recommendations is based both on the aggregate evidence quality and an assessment of the anticipated benefits and harms. Weaker recommendations are indicated by phrases such as “we suggest,” whereas stronger recommendations are typically stated as “we recommend.”
Title : The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of patients with solid pancreatic neoplasia
Doi org link : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.009
Volume : Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:17–28
URL : /docs/default-source/importfiles/publications_(public)/practice_guidelines/solid_pancreatic_neoplasia.pdf?Status=Master&sfvrsn=2
Select a choice : Keep
Content created : Dec 17, 2015, 00:00 AM
File size :
Number :
ExternalPK : 18518
Categories :
  • Biliary and Pancreatic Endoscopy
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Journal
  • Hepatopancreatobiliary
  • Practice Guidelines
Tags :
Solid_pancreatic_neoplasia
More clinical guidelines...