Guideline
The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory pancreatic fluid collections

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.027Get rights and content

Section snippets

Definitions

The Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis was revised in 2012, and inflammatory PFCs are currently categorized as acute peri-PFCs, pancreatic pseudocysts, acute necrotic collections, and walled-off necrosis (WON) (Table 2).6 Acute peri-PFCs occur early in pancreatitis, rarely become infected, and typically resolve spontaneously.7 On imaging, they appear homogenous, lack a defined wall, can be multiple, and conform to normal retroperitoneal fascial planes. Pseudocysts are fluid

Pseudocysts

Available endoscopic approaches for drainage of pseudocysts are transmural,21 transpapillary,21, 22, 23 or a combined transmural and transpapillary route.15, 24 Factors influencing the decision to proceed with one approach over another include the following: (1) the anatomic relationship of the collection to the stomach or to the duodenum, (2) the presence of ductal communication with the pseudocyst, (3) cyst contents, and (4) the size of the collection.

Transmural technique

Transmural drainage of pseudocysts is

WON

To drain WON endoscopically, a transmural approach similar to that described above is necessary to allow evacuation of solid material. However, the techniques used and the postprocedure management of the patient after initial drainage are more extensive than for uncomplicated pseudocysts and require highly skilled endoscopists and support staff.47, 48, 49 Traditionally, nasocystic drainage is performed in addition to the placement of 2 transmural plastic pigtail stents to facilitate the

After-procedure Care

After uncomplicated endoscopic drainage of noninfected pancreatic pseudocysts, most patients do not require hospitalization.57 Antibiotic prophylaxis usually is prescribed after drainage.58 A follow-up CT scan typically is obtained 4 to 6 weeks after the drainage procedure to assess for PFC resolution. The internal stents are eventually removed endoscopically after radiographic resolution is documented. In patients with chronic pancreatitis who have undergone transmural drainage, endoscopic

Adverse events of endoscopic therapy of PFCs

Serious adverse events may arise after endoscopic drainage of PFCs and include bleeding, perforation, infection, pancreatitis, aspiration, stent migration and/or occlusion, pancreatic-duct damage, adverse events related to sedation, and death. Less common events include cardiac air embolism, development of an arterial pseudoaneurysm, and inadvertent gallbladder puncture.61, 62, 63 One series of 148 patients undergoing EUS-guided transmural drainage of a mixture of pseudocysts, abscesses, and

Pseudocysts

Outcomes after attempted endoscopic therapy depend on the type of collection drained57 and the experience of the endoscopist.67 Pancreatic pseudocysts can be successfully drained in 82% to 100% of cases, with adverse events occurring in 5% to 16% and recurrence rates up to 18%.39, 47, 68, 69 A randomized trial comparing 20 patients undergoing open surgical cystgastrostomy to 20 patients receiving endoscopic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage found no recurrent pseudocysts in the

Summary

  • 1.

    We recommend that endoscopic drainage of PFCs be performed only after sufficient exclusion of alternative diagnoses, such as cystic pancreatic neoplasms and pseudoaneurysms. ⊕⊕⊕⊕

  • 2.

    We recommend waiting for maturation of the cyst wall of PFCs before endoscopic intervention. ⊕⊕⊕○

  • 3.

    We recommend drainage of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. ⊕⊕⊕○

  • 4.

    We suggest drainage of rapidly enlarging pancreatic pseudocysts. ⊕⊕○○

  • 5.

    We recommend drainage of all infected PFCs in patients who fail to improve with

Disclosures

V. Muthusamy is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Medtronic. K. Chathadi is a consultant for Boston Scientific. M. Khashab is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Xlumena.

References (77)

  • D.J. Desilets et al.

    New devices and techniques for management of pancreatic fluid collections

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2013)
  • M. Giovannini

    Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic drainage

    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am

    (2012)
  • A.L. Samuelson et al.

    Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts

    Gastroenterol Clin North Am

    (2012)
  • S. Varadarajulu et al.

    Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos)

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2008)
  • T.H. Baron et al.

    EUS-guided transesophageal pancreatic pseudocyst drainage

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2000)
  • J.J. Telford et al.

    Pancreatic stent placement for duct disruption

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2002)
  • S. Varadarajulu et al.

    Predictors of outcome in pancreatic duct disruption managed by endoscopic transpapillary stent placement

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2005)
  • C.W. Shrode et al.

    Multimodality endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct disruption with stenting and pseudocyst drainage: How efficacious is it?

    Dig Liver Dis

    (2013)
  • R.A. Kozarek

    Pancreatic stents can induce ductal changes consistent with chronic pancreatitis

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1990)
  • M.T. Smith et al.

    Alterations in pancreatic ductal morphology following polyethylene pancreatic stent therapy

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1996)
  • T.H. Baron et al.

    Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis

    Gastroenterology

    (1996)
  • T.H. Baron et al.

    Endoscopic transgastric irrigation tube placement via PEG for debridement of organized pancreatic necrosis

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1999)
  • T.H. Baron et al.

    Endotherapy for organized pancreatic necrosis: perspectives after 20 years

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2012)
  • A.S. Ross et al.

    Dual-modality drainage of infected and symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis: long-term clinical outcomes

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2014)
  • S. Varadarajulu et al.

    Multiple transluminal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2011)
  • P. Saxena et al.

    Resolution of walled-off pancreatic necrosis by EUS-guided drainage when using a fully covered through-the-scope self-expandable metal stent in a single procedure (with video)

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2014)
  • T.H. Baron et al.

    Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2002)
  • M.A. Khashab et al.

    Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2015)
  • M. Arvanitakis et al.

    Pancreatic-fluid collections: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal after endoscopic transmural drainage

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2007)
  • S.S. Rana et al.

    Consequences of long term indwelling transmural stents in patients with walled off pancreatic necrosis & disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome

    Pancreatology

    (2013)
  • A.Z. Jow et al.

    Complication of cardiac air embolism during ERCP and EUS-assisted cyst-gastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2012)
  • D.K. Bhasin et al.

    Non-surgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts associated with arterial pseudoaneurysm

    Pancreatology

    (2013)
  • S. Varadarajulu et al.

    Endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: outcomes and predictors of treatment success in 211 consecutive patients

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2011)
  • G.C. Harewood et al.

    Impact on patient outcomes of experience in the performance of endoscopic pancreatic fluid collection drainage

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2003)
  • I.J. Beckingham et al.

    Long term outcome of endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1999)
  • S. Varadarajulu et al.

    Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial

    Gastroenterology

    (2013)
  • A.A. Siddiqui et al.

    Outcomes of EUS-guided drainage of debris-containing pancreatic pseudocysts by using combined endoprosthesis and a nasocystic drain

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2013)
  • L.C. Hookey et al.

    Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    This document was reviewed and approved by the Governing Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

    View full text