This content is available to ASGE Members only. If you are member, please login to access the content. If you are not a member, learn about joining ASGE
Journal-Banner_rev

Artificial Intelligence During Barrett’s Endoscopy Is Accurate for Reporting Prague Criteria

Prateek Sharma, MD, FASGE reviewing Ali S, et al. Gastroenterology 2021 Sep.

During endoscopy, the extent of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is quantified by endoscopists using the widely accepted Prague C&M (circumferential and maximal lengths) criteria. Prague C&M scores can be used to assess the risk of progression but are subjective to endoscopists and their level of experience. 

This single-center pilot study evaluated a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted, automatic, 3-dimensional (3D) system for measuring BE depth and length using the Prague C&M classification system. Initially, an advanced deep learning model was developed by mapping 2-dimensional real-world endoscopy images, which were compared to a 3D phantom esophagus derived from CT and endoscopic images. Measurements of C and M lengths taken during endoscopy were then compared to those of the phantom esophagus ground-truth. The AI system was trained on 10,000 simulated images and validated using 2000 images (20%) for approximately 1000 epochs (100 hours). 

The automatic quantification of the C and M extent had an accuracy of 97.2% (2.8% relative error) and an average deviation of 0.9 mm from the ground-truth measurements. The root mean square error was 1.2 mm, confirming substantial agreement with the ground-truth (Cohen's kappa [k]=0.72 and Spearman correlation [rs]= 0.99). C and M measurements made by endoscopists during real-time patient endoscopy in 131 patients were compared to the automated measurement system. 

This endoscopy patient cohort comprised 3 subgroups: newly diagnosed BE patients (n=68), BE patients undergoing follow-up without endoscopic therapy (n= 24), and patients with comparison of pre-endoscopic and postendoscopic therapy visits (n= 39). For all patients, the overall relative errors (mean difference) were 8% (3.6 mm) and 7% (2.8 mm) for C and M values, respectively. The highest relative errors were experienced in those patients with BE lengths of 0 to 1 cm. Near-perfect interrater reliability was found between the AI system and endoscopists (k=0.84 and rs=0.99 for C; k=0.87 and rs=0.99 for M).


Comment:

The Prague criteria are a well-validated and globally standardized way of reporting the extent of Barrett’s esophagus. This novel measurement system, developed through advanced deep learning, allows automatic quantification of BE length using the C&M system. This will help endoscopists clinically, as well as in research studies, to evaluate the impact of therapy on changes in the Prague C&M scores.

https://www.asge.org/images/default-source/journal-scan/p-sharma.jpg?sfvrsn=d7d13353_0

Prateek Sharma, MD, FASGE

Bio and Disclosures

Citation(s):

Ali S, Bailey A, Ash S, et al. A pilot study on automatic three-dimensional quantification of Barrett’s esophagus for risk stratification and therapy monitoring. Gastroenterology 2021;161:865-878.e8. (https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.059)
80_logo